Tag: hypertension

  • Dietary Nitrate and Blood Pressure: What the Research Actually Shows

    Dietary Nitrate and Blood Pressure: What the Research Actually Shows

    This page is a reference summary of the published research on dietary nitrate and blood pressure. It is not medical advice. If your blood pressure is elevated, talk to your GP. I am a layperson who reads a lot at 3am.

    Last reviewed: June 2026.

    Affiliate disclosure: this page contains affiliate links, including to the Beet It shot and the Hilo monitor I use. I bought both with my own money. All views are my own.

    The link between dietary nitrate blood pressure reduction is real, reasonably well supported by clinical evidence, and almost always misused by the supplement industry to sell you something that doesn’t work. This page tries to separate those two things.

    What dietary nitrate is and how it works

    Dietary nitrate is an inorganic compound found in high concentrations in certain vegetables, principally leafy greens and root vegetables. Spinach, rocket, beetroot, and celery are the richest sources. It is not the same as the nitrates used as preservatives in processed meat, though the chemistry is related.

    The mechanism is straightforward and well understood. Dietary nitrate (NO3) is absorbed in the small intestine and concentrated in saliva. Bacteria on the tongue and in the mouth convert it to nitrite (NO2). In the stomach and bloodstream, nitrite is converted to nitric oxide (NO). Nitric oxide relaxes and widens the smooth muscle in blood vessel walls, reducing peripheral vascular resistance and therefore reducing blood pressure.

    This is not speculative biochemistry. It is the same fundamental mechanism exploited by glyceryl trinitrate (GTN spray), which has been used in cardiology for angina since the 1870s. The dietary route is slower and more sustained than the pharmaceutical route, but the underlying chemistry is the same.

    What the research shows on dietary nitrate blood pressure effects

    The clinical evidence for dietary nitrate and blood pressure is reasonably robust for a nutritional intervention. That is a deliberately cautious framing: it is not as strong as the evidence for antihypertensive medication, but it is substantially stronger than the evidence for most supplements.

    A 2013 Cochrane systematic review examined 16 randomised controlled trials of inorganic nitrate or nitrate-rich foods in adults. It found a mean reduction in systolic blood pressure of approximately 4.4 mmHg and diastolic of approximately 1.1 mmHg. Effect sizes were larger in studies using higher doses and in participants with elevated BP at baseline.

    A 2017 meta-analysis published in the Journal of Nutrition (Siervo et al.) covering 22 randomised trials found mean systolic reductions of 3.55 mmHg and diastolic reductions of 1.32 mmHg in healthy adults. In participants with hypertension at baseline, effect sizes were consistently at the higher end.

    A 2022 meta-analysis in Nutrients covering 43 trials found consistent systolic reductions in the 3-5 mmHg range across populations, with larger effects in older adults and those with higher baseline BP.

    A 3-5 mmHg reduction in systolic BP sounds small. It is not trivial. Population-level modelling suggests a sustained 2 mmHg reduction in mean systolic BP would reduce stroke mortality by around 10% and coronary heart disease mortality by around 7%. These are meaningful numbers at scale. For an individual, the clinical significance depends entirely on where your BP starts.

    The honest limitations: most trials are short, the majority running for two weeks or less. Evidence for sustained effects beyond 4-6 weeks in free-living populations is limited. Almost all trials are conducted under controlled conditions that are difficult to replicate in daily life. Effect sizes in trials tend to be larger than effects observed in real-world use. The evidence is stronger for acute effects than for sustained long-term reduction.

    The dose question

    This is where most dietary nitrate supplements fail, and where the marketing becomes actively misleading.

    The trials showing meaningful BP reductions consistently used doses in the range of 300-500 mg of dietary nitrate per day, with 400 mg being the most commonly cited threshold. To hit 400 mg from food alone requires approximately 200-250g of fresh spinach, a large bunch of rocket (roughly 150g), two medium beetroots (roughly 300g raw weight), or around 150g of celery.

    Most commercial beetroot supplements, gummies, powders and capsules do not disclose their nitrate content. Those that do frequently contain 50-100 mg per serving, which is 25-50% of the threshold dose used in the research. A supplement that does not disclose its nitrate content cannot be evaluated against the evidence base and should be treated with scepticism.

    The products used most frequently in the published research are standardised beetroot juice shots that guarantee a specific nitrate content per serving. The Beet It Sport Nitrate 400 shot (James White Drinks) is the most commonly used in UK academic research, delivering 400 mg dietary nitrate per 70 ml shot with Informed-Sport certification.

    The mouthwash problem

    This is the most practically important point on this page and the one most consistently omitted by supplement marketing.

    The dietary nitrate mechanism depends entirely on oral bacteria. If you kill those bacteria, you eliminate most or all of the blood pressure effect.

    Antibacterial mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine, and to a lesser extent cetylpyridinium chloride, kill the oral bacteria responsible for converting nitrate to nitrite. A 2013 study by Govoni et al. found that chlorhexidine mouthwash used twice daily reduced the blood pressure effect of dietary nitrate by approximately 90%. A 2019 study by Woessner et al. confirmed that antiseptic mouthwash substantially attenuated the nitric oxide response to nitrate supplementation.

    The practical implication: if you are using antibacterial mouthwash while taking dietary nitrate supplements, you are likely wasting your money. Standard fluoride toothpaste does not have this effect. The problem is specific to antibacterial mouthwash.

    Who should not use dietary nitrate

    If you take any medication containing organic nitrates for heart conditions or chest pain, including glyceryl trinitrate (GTN spray), isosorbide mononitrate, or isosorbide dinitrate, do not combine with dietary nitrate supplementation without medical advice. The combination can produce an additive vasodilatory effect and cause a dangerous drop in blood pressure.

    If you take phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction or pulmonary hypertension, including sildenafil (Viagra), tadalafil (Cialis), or vardenafil (Levitra), do not combine with dietary nitrate. The interaction can cause a severe, potentially dangerous drop in blood pressure.

    If you are already taking antihypertensive medication, dietary nitrate may produce an additive effect on blood pressure. This is not necessarily dangerous, but it is worth discussing with your GP before starting. If you are monitoring your own BP at home, a continuous monitor like the Hilo gives you far more data points than an occasional cuff reading, which matters when you are looking for a small signal in noisy data.

    One practical note: dietary nitrate from beetroot causes beeturia in a significant proportion of people, meaning pink or red colouration of urine and sometimes stools. This is harmless. It is caused by betalain pigments, not the nitrate itself. It will alarm you the first time if no one warned you.

    The supplement industry problem

    The research on dietary nitrate is real and the supplement industry has noticed. The result is a category of products that cite genuine science to sell products that do not replicate the conditions of that science.

    The specific patterns to watch for: products that do not disclose nitrate content per serving; products that claim proprietary extraction processes make them more bioavailable than standardised alternatives (there is no evidence base for this); testimonials from named individuals claiming specific mmHg reductions within specific timeframes.

    The clinical trials show mean reductions of 3-5 mmHg across populations. An individual testimonial claiming a reduction from 148/94 to 122/79 in 60 days is not evidence of the product working. It is a number that could reflect regression to the mean, lifestyle changes, medication adjustment, measurement error, or fabrication. The existence of real science in this area does not validate testimonials that exceed what the science shows.

    A live trial using this evidence base

    I am currently running a pre-registered 30-day n=1 trial of Beet It Sport Nitrate 400 for blood pressure, using a Hilo continuous BP monitor as the measurement instrument. The protocol, including the pre-specified hypothesis, baseline values, analysis plan and verdict criteria, was published before Day 1.

    The launch post is here and the pre-registration protocol is here. Results follow approximately 24 July 2026. If you want to understand how I am measuring and tracking BP as part of a broader health picture, the joined-up health data post covers that in detail, and there is a practical how-to guide for building your own health dashboard if you want to do something similar.

    The trial does not prove anything about dietary nitrate generally. It is one person’s data, with acknowledged confounders, using a single measurement instrument. What it does is apply this evidence base honestly to a real situation and report what happens without moving the goalposts.


    I’m Pete Harrison. I’m 55, I run a business, and I have a mild case of insomnia that means I spend a lot of time at 3am reading about gadgets, gear and ways to make life work better. Things I Learnt at 3am is where I write honestly about the things I’ve actually bought, tested and lived with. No fluff, no rehashing the spec sheet. Just the real verdict from someone who uses this stuff every day.

  • Hilo Blood Pressure Monitor Review: Two Years of Wearing It Every Day

    Hilo Blood Pressure Monitor Review: Two Years of Wearing It Every Day

    This is my Hilo blood pressure monitor review, written after two years of wearing it every single day. I have had high blood pressure since 2005. That is twenty years of it sitting at the back of my mind, of GP appointments, of trying things that did not work, and of a lot of 3am reading trying to understand why my numbers would not come down. I have read the books, tried the supplements, been on four different medications at once, and spent more evenings than I can count down research rabbit holes wondering whether it was salt, stress, sleep, or just bad luck.

    The Omron X7 upper arm cuff was my first serious piece of kit. It is genuinely excellent as a cuff monitor goes, and if you need a reliable home blood pressure monitor I would not argue with it. But the problem with a cuff monitor is the same as the problem with a bathroom scale. It only tells you what is happening at one moment in time, and only if you actually remember to use it. I am not great at either of those things.

    What I wanted was something I could wear all day that would tell me what my blood pressure was actually doing across a normal life. Exercise, sleep, stress, that second glass of red wine on a Friday. Not a snapshot. A picture.

    Omron X7 on Amazon

    The problem with wearable blood pressure monitors

    Most of them are enormous. If you look at the wrist-based BP monitors that were available a couple of years ago, they looked like something you would wear to measure your tyre pressure. Fine for occasional use at a desk, less fine if you sail, climb or run and need something that does not get in the way or look ridiculous.

    Then I found the Aktiia. It has since been rebranded as the Hilo, but it is the same device with a better app. Small, slim, looks like a regular fitness band. Waterproof. FDA cleared. It measures blood pressure continuously using optical sensors rather than a cuff, taking readings throughout the day and night without you doing anything. That last bit matters more than it sounds.

    The Amazon reviews at the time were mixed, which gave me pause. But the waterproof thing was a dealbreaker in the other direction. I sail a Nacra Inter 20 catamaran and I climb indoors. I do not want to be fussing with a watch every time I get in the water. So I took a punt.

    That was two years ago. I still wear it every day.

    Hilo blood pressure monitor wristband in black rubber with textured pattern and silver buckle

    What it actually tells you

    The app shows you time in target range, your average systolic and diastolic readings across different periods, and how your numbers change day to day. The screenshots I have included show my current data. My 7 day average is sitting at 130/82, which the app correctly categorises as elevated. My 6 month time in target range is 37 percent. Not where I want to be.

    But here is the useful bit. I know exactly why. I have had a knee injury that has kept me off running for a few weeks. My weight has crept up, my fitness has dropped, and both of those things show up in the numbers. I later wired the Hilo data together with my Garmin and Hume scales and let Claude analyse the lot. What it found about the knee injury and my blood pressure was one of those moments where data tells you something you had been wondering about for months.

    And that is the point of this device. Not that it makes your blood pressure better by itself. It gives you the feedback loop that was missing. Before the Hilo, I had a rough sense that exercise probably helped and cheese probably did not. Now I know it. I can see what a week of good running does to my readings versus a week on the sofa. I can see what happens after a night out. I can see that stopping eating cheese every day made a meaningful difference to my numbers, which I think is about the sodium content, though a book I found useful on this subject has a different theory about it being the sodium to potassium balance rather than sodium alone.

    If you want to understand that side of it, The High Blood Pressure Solution is the best thing I have read on the subject. Not medical advice, just genuinely useful background for understanding what is going on.

    On the potassium note: I have started having a banana every day again. Not a cure, not medical advice, but the sodium to potassium ratio argument made enough sense to me that I tried it, and my numbers have historically been better when I am consistent with it. Read the book and make your own mind up.

    Screenshot of a health monitoring app displaying average blood pressure readings of 130 systolic and 82 diastolic, marked as elevated, along with time in target range at 45%.

    The medication story

    I am not going to tell you what to take or not take. But I will tell you that at my worst I was on four medications simultaneously: lercanidipine, ramipril, bisoprolol and spironolactone. The bisoprolol was causing bradycardia, which meant my heart rate was too slow for my activity level. The spironolactone had diuretic effects that were genuinely incompatible with being active. I will leave it at that, except to say that having to stop a run to find a bush is not ideal when you are trying to get your numbers down through exercise.

    With a lot of 3am reading, and with some help from Gemini to help me structure my thoughts before GP appointments, I worked through the medications one by one with my doctor and got down to lercanidipine and ramipril, which is where I am now. The Hilo data was part of those conversations. Being able to show a GP a six month trend rather than a single clinic reading changes the conversation.

    None of this is medical advice. Talk to your GP. But continuous data is more useful than a cuff reading taken while you are already anxious about having a cuff reading taken.

    The practical reality after two years

    A few things worth knowing before you buy.

    You need to calibrate it once a month using a standard upper arm cuff, which is included in the box. It takes about five minutes and is not a big deal, but it is a recurring task. Set a reminder and it becomes habit.

    The strap does wear out. I bought a replacement after about 22 months, which cost around thirty pounds. Not nothing, but it is a consumable on a medical grade device and I did not find it unreasonable.

    It is waterproof. Genuinely waterproof, not splash resistant. I sail, I sweat, I climb. It has not given me a moment of trouble with water.

    The app has improved a lot since the Aktiia days. The rebranded Hilo app is cleaner, the insights are more useful, and the time in target range view in particular is something I check regularly.

    It does not replace a cuff for one-off clinical readings. If your GP needs a number for your notes, use a cuff. What the Hilo gives you is the picture around that number, which a cuff cannot.

    Mobile app screen displaying time in target range statistics for the last 7 days, including a bar graph showing 45% of readings in normal or optimal range, and categories for optimal, normal, elevated, and high readings.

    Hilo blood pressure monitor review verdict: would I buy it again?

    Yes, without hesitation. Two years in, still wearing it every day. It did not fix my blood pressure. Nothing fixes blood pressure like a tablet or a lifestyle change fixes blood pressure. But it gave me the information I needed to understand what was happening and to have better conversations with my doctor about it.

    If you have hypertension, or if you suspect you might, or if you are just the kind of person who wakes up at 3am wanting to understand their own body better, this is the most useful piece of kit I own. More useful than any supplement I tried. More useful than any single book. Because it shows you your own data, and your own data is the only data that actually matters. If you wear a Garmin Fenix, the two work well together as part of the same daily health picture.

    Also mentioned in this review: the Omron X7 cuff I used before, and The High Blood Pressure Solution.

    This post contains affiliate links. If you buy through them I may earn a small commission, at no extra cost to you.

    I used the Hilo to run a pre-registered beetroot trial for blood pressure, and it is now finished. The answer was no change at all, across 824 readings. You can read the full results here, along with the protocol I set before I started.


    pharrison131 Avatar

    Pete Harrison

    I’m Pete Harrison. I’m 55, I run a business, and I have a mild case of insomnia that means I spend a lot of time at 3am reading about gadgets, gear and ways to make life work better. Things I Learnt at 3am is where I write honestly about the things I’ve actually bought, tested and lived with. No fluff, no rehashing the spec sheet. Just the real verdict from someone who uses this stuff every day.